@article{Henning2015,
author = "Brian G. Henning",
title = "{Recovering the Adventure of Ideas: In Defense of Metaphysics as Revisable, Systematic, Speculative Philosophy}",
year = 2015,
journal = "Journal of Speculative Philosophy",
volume = 29,
number = "4",
pages = "437-456",
issn = "0891625X",
abstract = "{My aim in this article is twofold. First, I hope to show that, despite its seeming rehabilitation, metaphysics as systematic, speculative philosophy is no less threatened. Second, I will argue that metaphysics as systematic, speculative philosophy is ultimately revisable. That is, metaphysics is not (or should not be) the aim at a closed system of apodictic truths but, rather, an open-ended, fallibilistic pursuit of ever- more-adequate accounts of reality. Specifically, building on the work of Charles Sanders Peirce and Alfred North Whitehead, I will argue that we should conceive of metaphysics not as the quest for absolute certainty but as "working hypothesis." Thus, the first part will be largely historical and critical, and the second part will be positive and exploratory.}",
keywords = "Metaphysics",
language = "English",
note = "From the Commens Bibliography | \url{http://www.commens.org/bibliography/journal_article/henning-brian-g-2015-recovering-adventure-ideas-defense-metaphysics}"
}
