@article{Talisse2009,
author = "Robert B. Talisse",
title = "{Responses to My Critics}",
year = 2009,
journal = "Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society",
volume = 45,
number = "1",
pages = "90-108",
issn = "00091774",
abstract = "{The author responds to criticisms concerning his book "A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy." He states he avoided on writing a complete account about democracy as he was writing a philosophy of democracy rather than a theory of democracy. He comments on the epistemic views of democracy and reasonable pluralism that he wrote about and his assertion that Charles Peirce's views on democracy function better than John Dewey's. He talks about arguments against his belief that Deweyan democratic pragmatism fails when considering John Rawls's concept of pluralism. He comments on differences between moral perfectionism and political perfectionism and on how the epistemic perfectionist segments of Peirce's theory of democracy does not create an overriding duty to maximize epistemic capabilities.}",
keywords = "Democracy, Pluralism, John Rawls, Perfectionism",
language = "English",
note = "From the Commens Bibliography | \url{http://www.commens.org/bibliography/journal_article/talisse-robert-b-2009-responses-my-critics}"
}
