@article{Ramey2014,
author = "Joshua Ramey",
title = "{Contingency without Unreason}",
year = 2014,
journal = "Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities",
volume = 19,
number = "1",
pages = "31-46",
issn = "0969725X",
abstract = "{In this essay I critique the identification of contingency with sheer arbitrary possibility in Quentin Meillassoux's After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. After offering logical and metaphysical reasons for why such an identification is a limitation on the speculative potential of reason, I draw upon Charles S. Peirce, Gilles Deleuze, and Giambattista Vico to articulate the outlines of a view of contingency which can underwrite a different speculative position to one that is grounded upon an absolute of unreason. This form of speculation, a realism of contingency without an axiom of unreason, is indicated in outline by the structure of divination practices. I thus propose, without defending its actuality, at least the possibility of a divinatory form of speculation that is adequate to the absolute status of contingency.}",
keywords = "Contingency, Gilles Deleuze, Giambattista Vico",
language = "English",
note = "From the Commens Bibliography | \url{http://www.commens.org/bibliography/journal_article/ramey-joshua-2014-contingency-without-unreason}"
}